.
Feedback

Going Retro, Tax Style

Retroactive tax hikes one trend most could do without.

Grab those calculators – the state will soon begin taking an extra large bite out of taxpayers’ paychecks.

When the General Assembly passed the budget, they passed the highest tax increases in Connecticut’s history. And the personal income tax hike is retroactive – most taxpayers now owe 7 months of back taxes.

Starting Aug. 1 taxes will be withheld at new higher rates. The state will also collect the back-taxes due from Jan. 1 through July 31, 2011. In other words, for the first five months of the new rates– from August through December - wages will be withheld at more than twice the amount. 

“Most of my constituents knew that the tax hikes were coming. I’m frustrated as they are that we have to raise taxes. But it is what it is,” said state Rep. James Albis, a Democrat representing East Haven in the 99th House District. “Some people wondered why there is the retroactive hike. I had to explain fiscal year different than tax year.”

Once on the books, a tax hike tends to stick, area legislators said. But when people see the bigger tax bite taken out of their paychecks they will likely raise a ruckus.

“Last weekend I was at a neighborhood barbecue and people came up to me asking ‘Really? Retroactive?’ You had to make it retroactive?’” said state Rep. Kim Fawcett, a Democrat representing Fairfield and Westport in the 133rd House District. “That’s not just government putting the knife in, but turning it.”

Constituents also worry about the confluence of the income tax hike with newly enacted sales taxes and reduced property credits. For example, clothing and footwear that retails for $50 and less are now taxed. And the maximum property tax credit was reduced from $500 to $300.

People may very well postpone major and minor purchases, some legislators said.

Indeed some area retail stores are already seeing signs of acquisition aversion.

Until Aug. 1 three tax brackets divided the state: 3 percent, 5 percent and 6.5 percent. The new legislation added a 5.5 percent and a 6.7 percent bracket.

The three percent bracket will be eradicated for certain income levels. Instead it will be replaced with a five percent bracket. Included in this are those earning more than $100,500 and filing jointly, those filing singly and earning $56,500, those filing as head of household and earning $78,500, and those earning $50,250 married filing separately.

Also those filing joint returns of $700,000 or more will now pay 6.7 percent on all income. Before the budget passed they would have paid 3 percent on the first $20,000, and 5 percent on the next $680,000.

“I haven’t really heard from constituents,” said state Rep. Kim Rose, a Democrat representing Milford in the 118th House District. “I honestly haven’t gotten any phone calls or emails. I think it’s because there’s a lot of confusion about how it’s going to affect them.”

The tax hike also includes a ‘recapture’ of benefits of lower brackets, according to the Office of Policy Management. For those earning between $400,000 and $700,000, the recapture works to eliminate $150 of lower bracket benefits for every $10,000. That means joint filers will pay an extra $4,500. Joint filers earning $700,000 or more will pay an extra $12,300.

According to the Connecticut Business & Industry Association, the catch-up provision of the income tax increase shocks most residents. And the reduced spending power of state consumers combined with lower income for business people paying personal income taxes could hurt Connecticut's economy.

“The ripple effect is amazing,” state Rep. Laura Hoydick, a Republican representing Stratford in the 120th House District, said. “And when you do it in such a short amount of time it doesn’t give people a lot of time to adjust. They are dismayed, they are disgusted.”

For some organizations the tax increases have a silver lining.

According to a May 2011 Connecticut Voices for Children report, Joachim Hero, MPH and Shelley Geballe, JD, MPH said the changes will “start to rebalance Connecticut’s currently regressive system of state and local taxes by reducing taxes on many of Connecticut’s lower-income residents (through the EITC) while modestly increasing taxes at higher incomes. Connecticut ranks among the top ten highest tax states in the country in the share of income paid in state and local tax by its poorest 20%, though its wealthiest 1% pay a smaller share of their incomes in state and local taxes than in most other states.” 

Of course, the new tax hike means more paperwork. The state’s Department of Revenue Service published a new eight-page tax table and four pages of revised withholding rules for employers.

But then starting January 2012 taxpayers will need to re-do their withholding rules to subtract the retroactive calculations.

“This budget is not only disappointing and fails to make government more efficient; it represents a callous disregard for our struggling middle class. Connecticut has become an embarrassing example on a national level of how not to solve a budget crisis,” state Rep. Vincent Candelora, a Republican representing East Haven, North Branford, and Wallingford, in the 86th House District said in a press release. “In hoisting all of these taxes onto the people, state leaders have merely shifted our job of balancing a budget, onto the struggling middle class.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Stratford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Rusty Nail2 July 18, 2011 at 12:17 pm
Malloy is the king of income redistribution. This budget has an earned income tax credit in it of $400M. This money is being taken from CT tax paying citizens and then redistributed to CT citizens who pay no taxes! This is outrageous. Plus we get to pay for tuition now for illegal aliens. Malloy may be the most dangerous politician in this country. The power is going to his head.
Walt July 18, 2011 at 12:20 pm
I've started my countdown, at 62 I am OUTTA HERE! Taxing social security, atmospheric property taxes, sales taxes, gas taxes, income tax, taxes on pensions, and fees everywhere you turn. We sacrifice and the state employees share it.
Caring Citzen July 18, 2011 at 01:03 pm
I totally Agree Mark, its disgusting and they aren't smart enough to be ashamed.
William July 18, 2011 at 01:17 pm
EITC should go, as a state we can't afford more handouts.
Mark Lofthouse July 18, 2011 at 03:17 pm
Who's jeep would that be?
Mark Lofthouse July 18, 2011 at 03:25 pm
Sounds like this guy is real character!
JimK July 18, 2011 at 03:28 pm
I am determined to spend as little money in this horrible state as I can. And leave it as soon as I am able. Democrats: you are killing the state. If you actually care, and you intend to save it, your policies are having the opposite effect. It's time to re-think your philosophy of what government is and what it is for.
Fred Rondoo July 18, 2011 at 05:51 pm
too many state employees at higher than private salaries, higher benefits, higher pensions and longevity bonuses - privatize all these slugs suckling on the public teat like the Stratford cop who "retired" at $134,000 from a job paying $92,000 and now "works" as a cop at the Univ of New Haven.
Caring Citzen July 18, 2011 at 06:12 pm
FOR REAL? HOLY CRAP
Jim Miron July 18, 2011 at 11:00 pm
Rep. Hoydick's comments make me chuckle. When Laura was the head of the Board of Education her Boards recommeded some of the largest spending increases in Stratford's history!
Shelley Davis July 20, 2011 at 05:02 am
I mean lets face it even on a National level they areb always trying to terrorize us with their overspending and then threats of doom and gloom. I just keep thinking every time they say it that thats what I'm going to say when you start campaigning to be reelected. Your dooms day armegeddon of all your political aspirations is coming if you don't straighten out buddy.....
Shelley Davis July 20, 2011 at 05:07 am
That's the attitude we all need to have when it comes to Politicians, they need us we don't need them . Next election you can vote for another one.
Shelley Davis July 20, 2011 at 05:13 am
Personally I think elections were made for us to elect new Officals every time. There should be no secoind terms. No redoes, you get your one Term and your out.
That's incentive to do your job correctly the first time isn't it?
Luigi (the original) July 20, 2011 at 09:25 am
Shelley, sometimes one term is TOO MUCH! As is being proven by our current governor. I think he'll be satisfied only AFTER all viable businesses have departed the state and the middle class is left with NOTHING but the BILLS for his failures....
Shelley Davis July 20, 2011 at 01:57 pm
We hold all the cards though we just play stupid as citizens.
Instead of Apathy and Whining DO SOMETHING TO CHANGE IT>>>> There isn't a Politician in Office who doesn't want another Term in tbheir present Office or to be elected to a different Office. We let them bully and B... S... us then we vote them in and b.... for however many years. According to my MAyor it just takes any warm body to keep the Milford DMV Office open. That's how he values workers in Connecticut. The problem is that noone seems to effectively get it through the Elected Officials in this Country that their positions are subject to reassignment at every Election .... We need to address them as Employees and remind them daily we are always accepting Resumes'
Shelley Davis July 20, 2011 at 02:10 pm
Malloy isn't Governor forever and the Sky Isn't Falling Chicken Little
He just wants people to think it will nice, political tactic.Especially with the MAyan Calender Running out coming up and all. I've often wondered how long was that poor Mayan supposed to keep chiselling out that stone Calendar? maybe he just got tired or quit...LOL My point is anyway it goes the sun will come up again tomorrow, it isn't dependent upon the banking system or stocks or taxes. We'll cope, we'll survive,we always do. That is the attitude we should have when it comes to our Politicians playing using scare tactics.
Shelley Davis July 20, 2011 at 02:24 pm
I want to know how we go about proposing a Bill that will cut all the Elected Officials in this Country's Pay and Benefits by half. I think that would be a tremendous savings and is where we should start.... when it comes to balancing the budget.
Shelley Davis July 20, 2011 at 02:27 pm
I think we should cut State Elected Officials Pay and Benefits by 2/3rd's and we'll be off and running on getting the States Budget in line
Shelley Davis July 20, 2011 at 02:29 pm
They should drive their own vehicles pay for their own lunches and not be allowed to go to anything on someone elses dime. In the name of politics
Shelley Davis July 20, 2011 at 02:31 pm
What's the budget on all the money put out for those perks?
Momauguin Joe July 20, 2011 at 05:09 pm
"The American way of life is not negotiable!" ... George HW "Poppy" Bush, 1992
Shelley Davis July 20, 2011 at 06:30 pm
what you sent to me was rude and was an obvious expression of anger.
what you write is inappropriate and whinny to say the least
Luigi (the original) July 20, 2011 at 08:52 pm
So lets get this straight. If Someone posts anything on this site that this editor finds not agreeing with his political ideology, he will remove it. Is that it, Mr Genefaivre?
Gary Jeanfaivre (Editor) July 20, 2011 at 09:12 pm
No, Luigi (Jan 18th 2011) the original, that couldn't be further from the truth. Opinions of all political persuasions are always welcome, and encouraged. Comments that violate the Patch policy, including those that use inappropriate language, will be deleted - no matter who posts them. We understand there is a lot of frustration surrounding the actions being taken in Hartford, and we want to be a place where people can share their thoughts. In light of these retroactive taxes and the lost income they represent, are residents cutting back on spending? Where?
Luigi (the original) July 20, 2011 at 09:22 pm
It is to that frustration that my posts spoke. I re-worded one after it was pulled the first time. Anger and frustration is a natural result of these offensive and painful tax increases. We should be allowed this forum to vent that frustration or else why include these type of stories at all on your site. I truly believe both the substance AND the vocabulary of my previous posts were relevant and appropriate. To answer your last query, I don't know where else I can cut my spending, I already have so little disposable income. I guess eating will be optional for the rest of the year. Thank you Governor Malloy, may I have another?........
ColdButterfly July 21, 2011 at 12:56 am
YOUR GOOD A FEW REFERENCES TO INAPPROPRITE THINGS AND YOUR ALL GOOD BUT PEOPLE WHO REPLIED TO YOU GET CENSORED MUST BE BECAUSE YOUR A MAN.
ColdButterfly July 21, 2011 at 12:59 am
that isn't true it's about what you want to post, you post inappropriate references to pants down and the poster is still here anyone he offended is gone
ColdButterfly July 21, 2011 at 01:00 am
is it just womens political veiws you censor?
ColdButterfly July 21, 2011 at 01:06 am
Gary Jeanfaivre,
Maybe you should give women equal respect when it comes to their political veiws. Your sites don't like honesty they prefer crudeness?
Shelley Davis July 21, 2011 at 12:41 pm
perhaps your relationship with your local Police is such that you could depend on them when your safety is concerned mine isn't all that embarassment they have over driving the man home in a police cruiser who tried to burn me alive and assaulted me.
not to mention that noone wants to know Milford Schools have such drug issues there were kids in the High School planning a home invasion on another student's familily's home
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ashley Riera June 17, 2013 at 03:02 pm
To clarify, for those who are wondering why we can't just take the two cats up with us, we alreadyRead More have four cats, and a dog. We could only take two of the four cats with us, plus the dog (who is 14yrs. old.) The limit for the rental is three pets... this was a hard decision for us all. We would have taken them all if we could.
Bunny The Dog
Alyson Cahill June 13, 2013 at 07:01 am
Edit: Bunny was stolen WITH the truck. Suspect is Caucasian male in his 50s. Truck is red Dodge RamRead More with dent in rear passenger side cab. Please help! Call 203-257-3001 or 203-645-1282 with any information. No questions asked.
bpiretti June 13, 2013 at 12:15 pm
Found!! https://www.facebook.com/BringBunnyHome
Shirley B. Backus June 13, 2013 at 11:05 pm
Another example of why to never leave your pet unattended in your vehicle!
A photo of Sam (Credit: Contributed Photo)
Amy Taylor June 13, 2013 at 12:25 am
Thank you so much! You have no idea how grateful we are! You are very special people!!
Kathie June 13, 2013 at 03:58 am
Now that Sam has been found, the reason he ran off was due to the sound of gunfire at RooseveltRead More Forest in the early afternoon as his master was getting ready to take him out of his car. All had been quiet, the park was open, so the loud bangs were a surprise - both to Sam and his "Dad". To the best of my knowledge, when the shooting range is used by the Stratford PD, the park is closed to the public. It was that way always and I believe still is. But now, with non-Stratford police personnel using the range, obviously the Park is NOT closed as was observed/heard yesterday at 2 separate time periods of the day. The range is used by at least one other police department. Of course, there could be unauthorized people using the range too. I just don't know. But what I do know that yesterday (Wed), there was shooting early afternoon, and then again around 6PM. I observed at around 5:00PM, a little boy running up the dirt road that leads to the shooting range. The park remained opened all day! The shooting was NOT being done by the Stratford Police. People do not always stick to the trails, and as we all know, children can be quite curious. Who is to say a child and/or adult gets near the berm or behind it and someone shoots over the berm? What goes up, has to come down. I also was told that neighbors say there is shooting going on quite frequently, even on Sundays. I doubt that this is from Stratford PD, because outdoor shooting usually occurs for a week or so, twice a year. Tighter controls must be done! Surely, the parking area can be checked for vehicles... but I observed yesterday people entering the parking area (adjacent to the driveway leading up to the range) on foot, on bicycles, and motorcycles. So people could be in the park even when no vehicles are observed in the lot. Safety is key here! Procedures need to be put in place and perhaps limitations on when other police department(s) can use the range. It is not fair to the surrounding residents to have to hear the bang bang bang on Saturdays and Sundays. It scares some of them, and I know that one person who lives nearby says her dog gets scared right inside their house! What will it take? A child or an adult wandering near the range, thinking it is OK because the Forest is open... and then, all of a sudden, there is shooting and one gets shot, especially a child? This may sound extreme, but children can move quick and suddenly. I think of that little boy running up toward the range. He could have very well traveled through the woods. I can picture bullets being shot over the berm, not on purpose, but it can happen. Or shots go to the left or to the right; and people could be in the same general area - out of sight of the shooters. Bottom Line: The "public" can not be in the park while the range is "live", or in other words, when there is shooting taking place. As how to ensure that the public is not in the park, is not for me to determine. But the Town has to step up to the plate and address this very important issue.
bpiretti June 13, 2013 at 11:17 am
So happy to hear that your dog has been found! :)
ShirleyJ June 11, 2013 at 09:00 pm
Great shot! We were looking for the rainbow!!!
samgranata June 12, 2013 at 08:12 am
Great shot! One of my favorite places to take pictures of weather
Jaimie Cura (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 02:03 pm
That's beautiful Carol! I'm surrounded by land so this is so great to see!
re26 June 14, 2013 at 04:19 am
Reagan's quote is from the 1988 GOP convention that 'facts are stupid things'...John Adams made theRead More original quote.
Steve Raguskus June 15, 2013 at 10:20 am
I hope people note how these comments go. Anonymous right-wingers try to change the discussion,Read More prove a point that no one is arguing, and then declare victory. Both "Goodie Bassett" and "Reagan Night" say Ms. Daponte is lying because Tony Smith won't be removed from office. I just re-read Beth's piece to see where she made this claim, but she never said anything of the sort. What she did say was "Both Tony and Linda serve until January 1, 2016." So, where's the "half-truth"? The point of the post is that the new land use District II, comprised of the 3rd & 4th council districts, has no representation on any of these boards. Tony Smith will be the District II Zoning Commissioner, even though he doesn't live in that district. The extreme right can't defend this, so they try to change the subject.
richard brown June 15, 2013 at 12:29 pm
Isn't it odd that the half truths are written by people that won't sigh their real name but theRead More Democrats sign theirs. Huh, guess they don't want to be held accountable for their inuendo's and false acusations.