Moderate Mitt or Right-Winger Romney?

Presidential candidate Mitt Romney now hopes undecided voters view him as more moderate, but columnist Heather Borden Herve says don’t believe everything you think you see.

The weekend after the first presidential debate, my husband and I couldn’t stop replaying and critiquing what had happened in that first meeting of the candidates. Sobered by President Barack Obama’s disappointing performance, we were clear on at least one thing -- the race is far from over.

But we couldn’t help but notice something else. Throughout the Republican primary season, we’d watched as Gov, Mitt Romney persistently veered hard to the politically extreme right, choosing to ignore undecided independent voters and more moderate voices in his own party.

It seemed strange coming from a politician who used to be pro-choice, who used to be pro-marriage equality, who used to be a forward thinker on healthcare. But if that’s what it took to win the nomination of his increasingly fractured Republican Party, then that’s what candidate Romney would do.

So perhaps it shouldn’t have surprised anyone that, during his first debate against the President, 'Romney the Moderate' was back, swooping in to confuse us all. His admittedly strong performance aggressively challenging Obama won him the debate on style points alone, and it almost helped deflect attention from the position changes he was suddenly spouting. But could viewers tell the difference between ‘Mitt the Moderate’ and ‘Romney the Right-winger’?

Tactically, by flashing signs of the fiscally-conservative, socially-moderate GOP’er he once was, Romney was sending a message to those independent, undecided voters that could have been pretty much in the bag for the Republican nominee earlier on. Watching the debate, many of them likely sat up and listened a lot harder, thinking, “Could he still be ‘our’ guy too?”

In the days after that first debate, it became clearer that Romney had started erasing any memory of his preceding campaign stumbles, and he made strong headway in correcting the course of downward trending polls. He was helped along by debate answers that might not have been so factually truthful but sure sounded good to moderate Republicans hoping to hear a less extreme viewpoint. Fact-checking proved that Romney played loose with some of his statements; to be fair, the bi-partisan FactCheck.org found fault with both presidential candidates on things they asserted.

But the Romney we saw at the debate and since then is much different than the Romney we’d seen before. On questions about tax cuts we heard him say pre-debate that he’ll cut taxes across the board -- including for the top one percent -- but on debate night itself he said he’ll let top wage earners pay their fair share. He’s criticized the President’s healthcare plan, yet touted his own, almost identical one from his years as Governor of Massachusetts.

Romney made other statements that were designed to appeal to more moderate voters, but were not as truthful as the candidate would have you believe. He asserted his supposed support of those with pre-existing medical conditions -- in truth, not as many people in that category would be able to keep their health coverage under a Romney plan as he’d like voters to believe. Similarly he said he’d make sure grants for education would be protected, and education would be a high-focus priority in a Romney administration -- this, from the guy who’d previously said he’d eliminate the Department of Education. He even agreed that business needed government regulation!

Since then, Romney has similarly shown two sides on the issue of women’s healthcare and reproductive rights. One minute he asserted his perhaps less heavy-handed approach to choice: “There’s no legislation with regards to abortion that I’m familiar with that would become part of my agenda.” Doublespeak and obfuscation? Shortly thereafter his campaign backtracked and reaffirmed Romney’s strong opposition to safe and legal abortion, except in rare exceptions for rape, incest and when the mother’s life is in danger. Even his vice-presidential running mate, Paul Ryan -- with his own, more extreme views on abortion -- in his own debate appearance, reminded those of us who are pro-choice of Romney’s true intent to overturn Roe v. Wade.

But Romney is hoping the undecided voters are hooked, or at least have considered taking the bait. Might he really be the guy who can reach across the aisle to work with members of the opposing party? Could he be a President who rebuilds the economy and improves healthcare (even for women!) all the while strengthening our underperforming educational system?

I wouldn’t bet on it, and I’m hoping the President gets a little more fire in his belly to show the electorate -- especially the undecided voters -- that Romney is really a candidate who says only what he thinks they want to hear, and who won’t be able to keep the promises he makes to both sides of his own party.

Without knowing if it will be ‘Mitt the Moderate’ or ‘Romney the Right-winger’ on any given day of the remaining three weeks of the campaign, let’s hope everyone pays attention to which Mitt Romney they hear, knowing full well that we don’t really know which Mitt Romney we’d get should he win.

Common Sense Moderate October 16, 2012 at 12:24 PM
Ms. Herve, You're a partisan - and by making it clear that you are a partisan, you lose credibility from the get-go. Let's just make everyone aware of one thing - you live in CT and your vote for President is almost meaningless. The President will win this state. Focus your energy on local elections, which mean much more to your day-to-day lives. As far as Romney - he does come off as more Moderate (which is good), and if partisan dems think that more partisanship is going to help win over moderates... it won't. My advice to the president is to start acting more like a common sense moderate himself - partisans do not decide elections - moderates do.
Hansa Junchun October 16, 2012 at 12:40 PM
Exactly, Pjoe. Voting for president is pointless, because we don't need one. Obama's been partying and watching TV for years, so its like we don't have a president. Willard Romney retired in 1999 and hasn't a real job since. Truth its, we need to focus on Third District. We need to throw Rosa DeLauro out office right NOW. Rosa is fully culpable for the Syrian civil war, which began when she starved the Middle East by diverting our corn production toward ethanol. Rosa's blind loyalty to giant agro-corporations have led to civil war and the deaths of tens of thousands from Libya to Syria to Bahrain. For this, she need to be out.
CuriousOrange October 16, 2012 at 02:39 PM
Meanwhile, Romney's people are using every dirty trick in the book to keep the more conservative, Libertarian Gary Johnson from running. http://www.examiner.com/article/republicans-accused-of-crimes-to-sabotage-johnson
CuriousOrange October 16, 2012 at 02:44 PM
Saying Rosa DeLauro is 'fully culpable for the Syrian civil war' is like blaming Gov. Romney for the weather. As a matter of fact, the weather has more effect on food commodities than the American interest in sustainable energy sources.
Rich Patterson October 16, 2012 at 04:58 PM
Why Mitt Romney is Unlikable! Top Ten Reasons To Dislike Mitt Romney: 1. Handsome with gracious, statesmanlike aura. Looks like every central casting's #1 choice for Commander-in-Chief. 2. Been married to ONE woman his entire life, and has been faithful to her, including through her bouts with breast cancer and MS. 3. No scandals or skeletons in his closet. (How boring is that?) 4. Can't speak in a fake, southern voice when necessary. 5. Highly intelligent. Graduated cum laude from both Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School, and his academic records are NOT sealed. 6. Doesn't smoke or drink alcohol, and has never done drugs. 7. Represents an America of "yesterday", where people believed in God, went to Church, didn't screw around, worked hard, and became a SUCCESS! 8. Has a family of five great sons....and none of them have police records or are in drug rehab. 9. Oh yes.....he's a MORMON. We need to be very afraid of that very strange religion that teaches its members to be clean-living, patriotic, fiscally conservative, charitable, self-reliant, and honest. 10. Because of his wealth, he can't relate to ordinary Americans. I guess that's because he made that money HIMSELF. Apparently, working at a job and earning your own money made you unrelatable to Americans.
RMK October 16, 2012 at 08:55 PM
Romney is trying to win at all costs, without having a single position that reflects his conviction...he is that heartless, that calculating, that sociopathic. Even his father's former aide, Walter DeVries, has indicated as much in a scathing takedown of the candidate without a position: "While it seems that Mitt would say and do anything to close a deal – or an election,” he wrote, “George Romney’s strength as a politician and public officeholder was his ability and determination to develop and hold consistent policy positions over his life.” The conventional wisdom of the punditry claimed Romney won that debate, but they rated him solely on style points while lying through his teeth. How is it Mr. Romney suddenly stood to the left of President Obama's positions? Ask your favorite tea party Republican and they'll give you some pat answer about 'winning' the debate without a single mention of back pedaling away from the former tea party extremism that won him their nod for candidate. What a mess.
Hansa Junchun October 17, 2012 at 02:40 PM
Rosa DeLauro starved North Africa into riots and civil war. Rosa personally had everything to do with it! We used to sell food to the middle east and North Africa. Thanks to Rosa's subsidy program to fatten up huge multinational agro-corporations, they had no reason to sell corn to the people of Africa and Asia. Not when Rosa gave them a higher price for turning nutritious food into your gasoline. So the Africans bought from Russia, but when drought knocked off Russia's crops in 2010, they shut off the supplies and the Arab spring erupted as a consequence of Rosa's evil ethanol scheme. And this is why the blood of tens of thousands of innocent women and children cries from the parched soil of Libya, Syria, and Bahrain, accusing Rosa DeLauro of murder!
CuriousOrange October 17, 2012 at 02:57 PM
Hansa Junchun - stop being a victim and expecting the government to take care of you! If you are ever to be an entrepreneur, you have to change with the times -- tack with the wind like the captain of a sailboat. Take some personal responsibility and stop blaming Rosa DeLauro and economic conditions for your failure to hedge your risks.
Common Sense Moderate October 17, 2012 at 03:14 PM
I'm no fan of Rosa D, but blaming her for all this above is just rubbish. There are so many causes for these events abroad, and plenty of other - LOCAL! - reasons to vote against her. But this is where partisanship leads - unreasoned gibberish. My advice to all: stop reading / watching / listening to partisans. Spend time watching the PBS NewsHour and you'll all start smartening up.
Dancy White October 19, 2012 at 02:29 AM
Don’t miss this nudist lifestyle. 【Naturistpassion.c0m】 I would like to recommend you to the World's best and largest relationship site for nudists, naturists and best place to enjoy a natural, nude, naked, clothing free lifestyle.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »