.
Feedback

QU Poll Shows Broad Support for Gun Control

The poll by Quinnipiac University shows voters support a ban on assault weapons and that even gun owners are split on the issue of weapons control.

By margins of 2-1 or more, Connecticut voters support most gun control measures, including universal background checks (93–6 percent), a new Quinnipiac University poll released today shows.

Voters support stricter statewide gun-control laws, 66–30 percent, the independent poll finds. The poll shows support for specific measures including:

  • 68–28 percent back expanding the statewide ban on the sale of assault weapons. Gun owners are opposed 49–44 percent
  • 68–28 percent back a ban on the sale of ammunition magazines with more than 10 rounds. Gun owners are divided 49–48 percent
  • 72–27 percent back registration of all handguns, with annual renewal.  Gun owners are divided with 48 percent in favor and 50 percent opposed
  • 63 – 31 percent, including 50–46 percent among gun owners, favor limiting handgun purchases to one per month
  • 85–14 percent, including 71–28 percent among gun owners, back a permit requirement to purchase and carry all guns
  • 86–11 percent, including 85–12 percent among gun owners, favor a gun offender registry for those convicted of gun crimes;
  • 76–19 percent, including 65–32 percent among gun owners, back stricter gun storage requirements;
  • 50–43 percent back mandatory liability insurance for gun owners

"In the wake of the Newtown tragedy, there is overwhelming support among Connecticut voters for strengthening the state’s gun laws," said Douglas Schwartz, PhD, director of the Quinnipiac University poll.

"It is remarkable how bipartisan the support is for some of the most talked-about gun-control measures," he added. "Universal background checks tops the list with 93 percent support, higher than we’ve ever seen for any issue in 20 years of Connecticut surveys."

"Interestingly, Republican voters are divided 45–48 percent on the general question, 'Do you support or oppose stricter gun-control laws in Connecticut?'  They support, however, most of the specific measures," Schwartz added.

The Newtown tragedy makes them more likely to support gun-control, 54 percent of Connecticut voters say, while 43 percent say it makes no difference.

Voters are divided on a proposal to prohibit people convicted of drunk driving from owning guns, with 45 percent in favor and 48 percent opposed.

Voters also are divided on a proposed ban on children under 18 playing violent point-and-shoot video games in public arcades, with 46 percent in favor and 48 percent opposed.

Voters do support 54–41 percent placing armed police officers in public schools in the state.

Donald Borsch Jr. March 7, 2013 at 03:16 am
Pro-gun rights rally, 11 Mar 2013, Monday at The State Capitol!
http://ccdl.us/component/content/article/38-news/240-lobby-day-at-the-capitol
Chris March 7, 2013 at 12:24 pm
The poll is virtually meaningless unless they release more info. It's only based on 1009 people, and they weighted the results. Unless we see the raw data it means squat. For all we know they might have only polled 2 gun owners and then extrapolated their results from those 2. Or maybe they only polled voters in a certain part of the state. Without the rest of the facts this is meaningless. I just took a poll and the results showed 100% opposed any further gun control laws.
Jason Bagley (Editor) March 7, 2013 at 03:29 pm
Chris, are the results of the poll you took available online?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Stratford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mike Reynolds June 19, 2013 at 08:53 pm
I noticed the same thing!!! What the hell was that?
C.S. June 19, 2013 at 09:41 pm
Goodfella's?
C.S. June 19, 2013 at 05:19 pm
They are an awful company, I called as well as e-mailed my displeasure with their new and easier toRead More navigate homepage and was met with surprise by the tech support person. My location says that I am in West Babylon NY when I am in Milford CT (can't change that), the e-mails delete willy nilly (note: be careful to pay attention to your highlighted e-mail as it is not always the one that is being deleted). Oh, and why on earth such a huge map of their optimum hotspots when I am at home and as their customer they should at least figure that I have the internet service so therefore no reason for a hot spot at home. I am totally amazed that nobody, not one person at Optimum took a look at that piece of junk and still thought that it was ready to release to the public? Best part is that they were so sure that we'd all love it that we cannot go back to the old home page. Simply beyond amazing.
C.S. June 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I'm still waiting for them to figure out how to pause and rewind live TV. Apparently they areRead More working on it, and have been for the last 5 years.
Ashley Riera June 17, 2013 at 03:02 pm
To clarify, for those who are wondering why we can't just take the two cats up with us, we alreadyRead More have four cats, and a dog. We could only take two of the four cats with us, plus the dog (who is 14yrs. old.) The limit for the rental is three pets... this was a hard decision for us all. We would have taken them all if we could.
Bunny The Dog
Alyson Cahill June 13, 2013 at 07:01 am
Edit: Bunny was stolen WITH the truck. Suspect is Caucasian male in his 50s. Truck is red Dodge RamRead More with dent in rear passenger side cab. Please help! Call 203-257-3001 or 203-645-1282 with any information. No questions asked.
bpiretti June 13, 2013 at 12:15 pm
Found!! https://www.facebook.com/BringBunnyHome
Shirley B. Backus June 13, 2013 at 11:05 pm
Another example of why to never leave your pet unattended in your vehicle!
A photo of Sam (Credit: Contributed Photo)
Amy Taylor June 13, 2013 at 12:25 am
Thank you so much! You have no idea how grateful we are! You are very special people!!
Kathie June 13, 2013 at 03:58 am
Now that Sam has been found, the reason he ran off was due to the sound of gunfire at RooseveltRead More Forest in the early afternoon as his master was getting ready to take him out of his car. All had been quiet, the park was open, so the loud bangs were a surprise - both to Sam and his "Dad". To the best of my knowledge, when the shooting range is used by the Stratford PD, the park is closed to the public. It was that way always and I believe still is. But now, with non-Stratford police personnel using the range, obviously the Park is NOT closed as was observed/heard yesterday at 2 separate time periods of the day. The range is used by at least one other police department. Of course, there could be unauthorized people using the range too. I just don't know. But what I do know that yesterday (Wed), there was shooting early afternoon, and then again around 6PM. I observed at around 5:00PM, a little boy running up the dirt road that leads to the shooting range. The park remained opened all day! The shooting was NOT being done by the Stratford Police. People do not always stick to the trails, and as we all know, children can be quite curious. Who is to say a child and/or adult gets near the berm or behind it and someone shoots over the berm? What goes up, has to come down. I also was told that neighbors say there is shooting going on quite frequently, even on Sundays. I doubt that this is from Stratford PD, because outdoor shooting usually occurs for a week or so, twice a year. Tighter controls must be done! Surely, the parking area can be checked for vehicles... but I observed yesterday people entering the parking area (adjacent to the driveway leading up to the range) on foot, on bicycles, and motorcycles. So people could be in the park even when no vehicles are observed in the lot. Safety is key here! Procedures need to be put in place and perhaps limitations on when other police department(s) can use the range. It is not fair to the surrounding residents to have to hear the bang bang bang on Saturdays and Sundays. It scares some of them, and I know that one person who lives nearby says her dog gets scared right inside their house! What will it take? A child or an adult wandering near the range, thinking it is OK because the Forest is open... and then, all of a sudden, there is shooting and one gets shot, especially a child? This may sound extreme, but children can move quick and suddenly. I think of that little boy running up toward the range. He could have very well traveled through the woods. I can picture bullets being shot over the berm, not on purpose, but it can happen. Or shots go to the left or to the right; and people could be in the same general area - out of sight of the shooters. Bottom Line: The "public" can not be in the park while the range is "live", or in other words, when there is shooting taking place. As how to ensure that the public is not in the park, is not for me to determine. But the Town has to step up to the plate and address this very important issue.
bpiretti June 13, 2013 at 11:17 am
So happy to hear that your dog has been found! :)
ShirleyJ June 11, 2013 at 09:00 pm
Great shot! We were looking for the rainbow!!!
samgranata June 12, 2013 at 08:12 am
Great shot! One of my favorite places to take pictures of weather
Jaimie Cura (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 02:03 pm
That's beautiful Carol! I'm surrounded by land so this is so great to see!
re26 June 14, 2013 at 04:19 am
Reagan's quote is from the 1988 GOP convention that 'facts are stupid things'...John Adams made theRead More original quote.
Steve Raguskus June 15, 2013 at 10:20 am
I hope people note how these comments go. Anonymous right-wingers try to change the discussion,Read More prove a point that no one is arguing, and then declare victory. Both "Goodie Bassett" and "Reagan Night" say Ms. Daponte is lying because Tony Smith won't be removed from office. I just re-read Beth's piece to see where she made this claim, but she never said anything of the sort. What she did say was "Both Tony and Linda serve until January 1, 2016." So, where's the "half-truth"? The point of the post is that the new land use District II, comprised of the 3rd & 4th council districts, has no representation on any of these boards. Tony Smith will be the District II Zoning Commissioner, even though he doesn't live in that district. The extreme right can't defend this, so they try to change the subject.
richard brown June 15, 2013 at 12:29 pm
Isn't it odd that the half truths are written by people that won't sigh their real name but theRead More Democrats sign theirs. Huh, guess they don't want to be held accountable for their inuendo's and false acusations.