.
Feedback

Connecticut Gives Energy Efficiency a Jolt

Massive energy bill passes muster, awaits governor's signature.

It wasn’t a silent spring on the energy front; the General Assembly passed the first comprehensive energy bill in 30 years.

“These are things we know we should have been doing,” said state Sen. Gayle Slossberg, a Democrat representing Orange, Milford, and West Haven in the 14th Senate District.

The massive bill, SB 1, aims to jolt Connecticut’s energy policy, lower electricity costs, and push the state to lead in clean technology. It creates a new Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, DEEP. And unlike the 2010 energy bill Gov. M. Jodi Rell vetoed, this bill will get Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s signature.

“This legislation has multiple benefits for policy makers and for ratepayers – positioning us to bring down the high cost of energy, as well as bolstering job growth and innovation in our renewable energy sector,” said Malloy in a written statement.

However, many of the measures that directly affect consumers won’t go into effect until October.

“We’ve been very invested in energy issues and for a little state not to have had any comprehensive plan made no sense. It was as if we had been broken up into 159 little fiefdoms,” Lori Brown, executive director for Connecticut League of Conservation Voters, said. “Considering all the intricacies of the bill I can say overall we are tentatively happy with it. It’s many steps in the right direction.”

However, it’s not likely the bill would have passed had it not been for the work of state Rep. Vickie Nardello, a Democrat representing Cheshire, Bethany, and Prospect in the 89th House District and state Sen. John Fonfara, a Democrat representing Hartford and Wethersfield in the 1st Senate District. The lawmakers chair their respective energy committees.

“We are clearly moving to cleaner energy, energy efficiency and renewable energy, and have successfully balanced our energy needs in a way that recognizes the impact on rate payers,” said Nardello in a written statement. “We have included goals for lowering rates in all aspects of our planning process.”

Many also credit state Sen. Kevin Witkos, a Republican representing Avon and Canton in the 8th Senate District with helping shepherd the bill through.

“It was a bi-partisan effort all the way. If a steamroller is coming down the street you can either jump on or jump in front. Most people decided to jump on,” said Mike Trahan, executive director of Solar Connecticut, Inc., an association of 50 solar businesses.

As such, the bill pleases Trahan.

“Its biggest strength is in its long term commitment to energy policy, something the state has not had for a long time, at least not in my recent memory,” Trahan said. “Most importantly we feel we have an ally in the governor’s office.”

Effective Oct. 1, consumers wanting to replace old furnaces and burners will be able to do so with a new program. A home energy audit is required for eligibility. Condominium associations will also be eligible for energy efficiency programs come Oct. 1.

It will also try to get new renewable energy projects and try and give consumers more protection should they choose to switch to competitive electricity suppliers.

And aside from introducing a Code of Conduct for suppliers, the state will have more flexibility in how it purchases power, said state Rep. T.R. Rowe, a Republican representing Trumbull in the 123rd House District.

The bill also makes a Clean Energy Finance & Investment Authority. This will be charged with leveraging private capital for clean energy projects.

Whether the state will attract private capital is another matter, particularly since many lawmakers called the governor’s budget anti-business.

But Chris Phelps, program director for Environment Connecticut, said the state hasn’t much choice. One, it has the highest electric costs in the nation after Hawaii. Two, the state can’t risk falling behind the green industry.

“In reality clean energy technology is a growth area. This is where our economy is going, this is what will create jobs,” Phelps said. “We’ve got to catch that wave.”

Cutting costs depends both on reducing consumption through efficiency, as well as mitigating volatility of rates. It also depends on how Connecticut will deal with buying power and reusable energy.

One lawmaker who voted for the bill said consumer’s costs wouldn’t decline soon.

“Last year’s bill was an abomination,” said state Rep. Larry Miller, a Republican representing Shelton and Stratford in the 122nd House District. “This bill is a very complicated bill but I voted for it because we need to do something. I’m not sure we’ll see a quick reduction in the bill because we subsidize so much through the electric bill.”

Miller said he knows the new DEEP aims to save money, streamline the permitting process, and unify the energy policy. But he worries it will mirror the DEP, an agency he deems ineffective.

“DEP is not my favorite,” Miller said. “They’re a bunch of liberal tree huggers in that department. They’re asleep up there. They’re over doing it going after petty stuff. They’re worried about sinkers that break off in the sound.”

Miller also wants Connecticut to stop subsidizing the solar industry.

He won’t find any quarrel there.

“It’s helpful to kick start an industry but we want to get off incentives as quickly as possible,” Trahan said. “First it’s rate payers money, and second, it’s difficult to run a business when the government has such a big role in it.”

According to environmental and energy groups, solar energy is getting competitive. Indeed, General Electric predicts it will compete with fossil fuels within five years.

Right now, a total system would cost homeowners between $8,000 and $12,000. State subsidies push the price down to between $4,000 and $6,000. And the system generally pays for itself in about six years, Trahan said.

“It’s got positive goals, it will switch us over to more reusables,” said state Rep. Paul Davis, a Democrat representing Milford, Orange, and West Haven in the 117th House District.

Robert Jochim June 27, 2011 at 10:40 am
Increasing the size of government is NEVER a good thing...
John P. Flanagan June 27, 2011 at 11:30 am
Sorry. This was not the first comprehensive energy disaster to issue from the legislature in 30 years. We had the idiocy of deregulation in the '90s which "comprehensively" raised rates without any necesssity. At about the same time we got split bills alleged to make rates more clear; but, in reality to confuse the issue by splitting our bills between the mugging in the alley and theft on the street.
The result: the disaster for consumers the Legislature foresaw in the 1930's and 40's when a DPUC was created to oversee the monopolies. All the companies made great profits. So, please no nonsense about deregulation being a benefit. My wallet doesn't show it. I've discussed undoing that damage with legislative leaders. Their excuse was that the legislation had forced the utilities to close, or sell, their plants. (Why?) The State paid the utilities 1 billion dollars to unload their plants. And, they might look foolish trying to undo it. I've never seen any legislation, not resulting in death, unable to be undone. My response was admit the errors and, by similar legislation, require the utilities to reacquire their production capacity or go out of business. That was when the tap dancing began. So, it appears that they have now created a new disaster. Their solution is to waste more taxpayers dollars by attempting to reinvent the wheel. And, not by removing the corners they put on it; but, by trying to convince us that square wheels work.
Mike June 27, 2011 at 01:20 pm
If you think the cost of energy is high now, wait till the government starts fooling around with it.
Don Charles June 28, 2011 at 12:39 pm
Just what we need the DEEP another wastful commision to rip us off and keep all the tree huggers happy.
Hey lets all go out and buy electric cars so we can drive 40 miles and then have to use gas. It will only cost 40,000 from Obama Motors and maybe they will give us a UHaul that we can trailer so we can carry whatever we need when we travel and also keep our kids and pets in since there will be no room in these wonderful cars. HOW"S THAT HOPE AND CHANGE TREATING YOU? STILL DREAMING!!!
SolarPete August 1, 2011 at 12:20 am
If anyone is interested in solar energy please let me know I live in a 1923 home and I made it energy efficient reduced my carbon foot print and turned the home into a solar home. It's a net zero home where I make more energy than I use in a year. I sell back my extra power to the power company and at todays prices my 5.04 kw PV system would cost around 25,000.00 I paid 42,500.00 for mine back in 2008.I live in a very hot climate and even with the a/c on in the heat of the summer I still have no power bills each month
Michael Brown August 1, 2011 at 11:04 am
Anyone with forced air heating and/or cooling systems should consider the new geothermal options. A heat-pump combined with a geothermal system can cut your energy costs by 40%.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Stratford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mike Reynolds June 19, 2013 at 08:53 pm
I noticed the same thing!!! What the hell was that?
C.S. June 19, 2013 at 09:41 pm
Goodfella's?
C.S. June 19, 2013 at 05:19 pm
They are an awful company, I called as well as e-mailed my displeasure with their new and easier toRead More navigate homepage and was met with surprise by the tech support person. My location says that I am in West Babylon NY when I am in Milford CT (can't change that), the e-mails delete willy nilly (note: be careful to pay attention to your highlighted e-mail as it is not always the one that is being deleted). Oh, and why on earth such a huge map of their optimum hotspots when I am at home and as their customer they should at least figure that I have the internet service so therefore no reason for a hot spot at home. I am totally amazed that nobody, not one person at Optimum took a look at that piece of junk and still thought that it was ready to release to the public? Best part is that they were so sure that we'd all love it that we cannot go back to the old home page. Simply beyond amazing.
C.S. June 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I'm still waiting for them to figure out how to pause and rewind live TV. Apparently they areRead More working on it, and have been for the last 5 years.
Ashley Riera June 17, 2013 at 03:02 pm
To clarify, for those who are wondering why we can't just take the two cats up with us, we alreadyRead More have four cats, and a dog. We could only take two of the four cats with us, plus the dog (who is 14yrs. old.) The limit for the rental is three pets... this was a hard decision for us all. We would have taken them all if we could.
Bunny The Dog
Alyson Cahill June 13, 2013 at 07:01 am
Edit: Bunny was stolen WITH the truck. Suspect is Caucasian male in his 50s. Truck is red Dodge RamRead More with dent in rear passenger side cab. Please help! Call 203-257-3001 or 203-645-1282 with any information. No questions asked.
bpiretti June 13, 2013 at 12:15 pm
Found!! https://www.facebook.com/BringBunnyHome
Shirley B. Backus June 13, 2013 at 11:05 pm
Another example of why to never leave your pet unattended in your vehicle!
A photo of Sam (Credit: Contributed Photo)
Amy Taylor June 13, 2013 at 12:25 am
Thank you so much! You have no idea how grateful we are! You are very special people!!
Kathie June 13, 2013 at 03:58 am
Now that Sam has been found, the reason he ran off was due to the sound of gunfire at RooseveltRead More Forest in the early afternoon as his master was getting ready to take him out of his car. All had been quiet, the park was open, so the loud bangs were a surprise - both to Sam and his "Dad". To the best of my knowledge, when the shooting range is used by the Stratford PD, the park is closed to the public. It was that way always and I believe still is. But now, with non-Stratford police personnel using the range, obviously the Park is NOT closed as was observed/heard yesterday at 2 separate time periods of the day. The range is used by at least one other police department. Of course, there could be unauthorized people using the range too. I just don't know. But what I do know that yesterday (Wed), there was shooting early afternoon, and then again around 6PM. I observed at around 5:00PM, a little boy running up the dirt road that leads to the shooting range. The park remained opened all day! The shooting was NOT being done by the Stratford Police. People do not always stick to the trails, and as we all know, children can be quite curious. Who is to say a child and/or adult gets near the berm or behind it and someone shoots over the berm? What goes up, has to come down. I also was told that neighbors say there is shooting going on quite frequently, even on Sundays. I doubt that this is from Stratford PD, because outdoor shooting usually occurs for a week or so, twice a year. Tighter controls must be done! Surely, the parking area can be checked for vehicles... but I observed yesterday people entering the parking area (adjacent to the driveway leading up to the range) on foot, on bicycles, and motorcycles. So people could be in the park even when no vehicles are observed in the lot. Safety is key here! Procedures need to be put in place and perhaps limitations on when other police department(s) can use the range. It is not fair to the surrounding residents to have to hear the bang bang bang on Saturdays and Sundays. It scares some of them, and I know that one person who lives nearby says her dog gets scared right inside their house! What will it take? A child or an adult wandering near the range, thinking it is OK because the Forest is open... and then, all of a sudden, there is shooting and one gets shot, especially a child? This may sound extreme, but children can move quick and suddenly. I think of that little boy running up toward the range. He could have very well traveled through the woods. I can picture bullets being shot over the berm, not on purpose, but it can happen. Or shots go to the left or to the right; and people could be in the same general area - out of sight of the shooters. Bottom Line: The "public" can not be in the park while the range is "live", or in other words, when there is shooting taking place. As how to ensure that the public is not in the park, is not for me to determine. But the Town has to step up to the plate and address this very important issue.
bpiretti June 13, 2013 at 11:17 am
So happy to hear that your dog has been found! :)
ShirleyJ June 11, 2013 at 09:00 pm
Great shot! We were looking for the rainbow!!!
samgranata June 12, 2013 at 08:12 am
Great shot! One of my favorite places to take pictures of weather
Jaimie Cura (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 02:03 pm
That's beautiful Carol! I'm surrounded by land so this is so great to see!
re26 June 14, 2013 at 04:19 am
Reagan's quote is from the 1988 GOP convention that 'facts are stupid things'...John Adams made theRead More original quote.
Steve Raguskus June 15, 2013 at 10:20 am
I hope people note how these comments go. Anonymous right-wingers try to change the discussion,Read More prove a point that no one is arguing, and then declare victory. Both "Goodie Bassett" and "Reagan Night" say Ms. Daponte is lying because Tony Smith won't be removed from office. I just re-read Beth's piece to see where she made this claim, but she never said anything of the sort. What she did say was "Both Tony and Linda serve until January 1, 2016." So, where's the "half-truth"? The point of the post is that the new land use District II, comprised of the 3rd & 4th council districts, has no representation on any of these boards. Tony Smith will be the District II Zoning Commissioner, even though he doesn't live in that district. The extreme right can't defend this, so they try to change the subject.
richard brown June 15, 2013 at 12:29 pm
Isn't it odd that the half truths are written by people that won't sigh their real name but theRead More Democrats sign theirs. Huh, guess they don't want to be held accountable for their inuendo's and false acusations.