.
Feedback

You're Guilty! She's Guilty! We're ALL Guilty!

Forget Macaulay Culkin’s 'Home Alone' comedy. These days, is it ever a laughing matter -- let alone acceptable -- when a child is left home without an adult present?

You and I are guilty.

What crime have we committed? Apparently, at some point in our lives, we've been guilty either of child neglect or of busybody, un-neighborly meddling.

Consider the judgmental reactions to the recent case of a when her 4-year-old wandered off while in the care of a 13-year-old sibling. Judging by those judgmental reactions, there's no right in this situation, so you and I must be similarly guilty as charged.

According to published reports, police say this mother left her four children -- ranging in age from 13 years to 8 months -- alone at home to go to church. Police were called to the home by a neighbor who said the woman's 4-year-old had wandered into the yard across the street alone. Police arrested the mother and charged her with risk of injury to a minor.

When Patch published the police blotter arrest report, comments flew fast and furious -- 170 at last count in the days that followed since the arrest. Here's the understatement of the year: about whether the mother was right to leave her eldest child to watch over the younger three children, and whether she as the parent should be held accountable when the 4-year-old wandered off.

But just as there are critics of the mom, Patch readers had some forceful opinions about the neighbor who summoned police, with some accusing her of acting in anything but a neighborly way. Instead of calling police, many said, she should have simply walked the child back across the street and offered a sympathetic hand to a fellow resident.

Dorothy, it seems we're not in small town -- or old time -- Kansas anymore.

In some ways I've been both the parent in this situation and the kid. And at one point or another, I'm sure I've been the bystander too.

As a parent, I've got to say deciding when and whether to leave your children is a case-by-case thing and it's completely individual.

I've hired 13-year-old babysitters to watch my children when they were between 18 months and 6-years-old. I knew the teens well and they were truly smart, responsible kids -- plus I wasn't headed into New York City for a late night out, but rather I'd opted for this childcare solution knowing I'd be close by right here in town.

I'd like to think that a mother knows her own child and that child's abilities and limits; many readers felt it was wrong to criticize the mother's parenting without knowing the full extent of the family's situation.

With our own pre-tween 10-year-old, my husband and I have begun to figure out how to begin extending the boundaries and comfort levels of leaving him alone for 15 minutes or so and teaching him how to feel comfortable and responsible when he's old enough to spend more extensive time on his own.

Each parent has to determine when moments are right to teach children responsibilities and independence. So too, sometimes, the realities of busy family life and schedules necessitate teaching kids how to care for themselves and siblings. That should be up to the parents, within the confines of the law. 

Speaking of which, what does the law say about this case? Not a whole lot. There are guidelines provided by CT’s Department of Children and Family that say it's up to each parent, depending on their child's readiness, but that "Experts believe a child should be at least 12 before he is left alone, and at least 15 before he can care for a younger brother or sister. These are the minimum ages. Not every child is ready then."

(It's important to note that, according to safekids.org, "even if a state does not have a specific law prohibiting adults from leaving children unattended, state and local prosecutors have the discretion to criminally charge adults under existing child endangerment laws.")

Way back when I was a child, I walked to and from school alone from the age of five. Different times, different mores, I know. Looking back even further, the summer when my dad was only 10, his hard-working parents stayed in the city to work while they left him alone at a Catskills summer bungalow colony, Mondays through Saturday mornings.

Five and a half days. Alone.

They'd leave him with a big pot of spaghetti in the fridge, and under the watchful eye of the neighbor friend across the path every week, and he survived just fine until they joined him each weekend.

I joke that today my dad would be on the cover of the New York Post for days on end if he were a child of 2012. But then I think about the Etan Patz case making recent headlines again, and it's no longer something to laugh about. Suddenly the good old days don't feel so 'safe' anymore.

Which brings us to our 'busybody' neighbor.

Perhaps she was the last defense between that New Canaan 4-year-old and tomorrow's New York Post cover story. Who knows the true situation and back story there? Perhaps there were prior incidents of negligence, or bad blood between the main characters that prompted a vengeful call to police. There's a wistful voice inside my head that asks, What happened to simply walking the neighbor's 4-year-old back home before calling in the national guard? Perhaps she saved a life that day instead.

We hear more and more stories of parents who make poor choices to leave their children unattended -- about kids left in a coffee shop while their mom grocery shopped ran shortly after the New Canaan story -- and I've heard multiple local anecdotes of parents leaving minors in a car to dash in somewhere for a fast errand, only to find police waiting for them on their return.

In some ways, we've all been there, and made a momentary, split-second decision on either side of the coin. Do I wake the baby if I need to wait for my older child at the corner bus stop? Will my children be okay if I just step out of the car and leave them for a few moments to pay for gas inside the station or pick up the dry cleaning? Do I say something to that woman on the beach who walked away from her young children twice in the last hour?

Is it that times have changed? Because it isn't that parents and kids have. Should we look at this story with the stark, modern reality that there are bad people 'out there' and feel that the need to be watchful, neurotic and paranoid in a big bad dark world is real?

Or are we mournful about the sad loss of a more innocent time, of neighbors who knew each other and looked out for one another, when police officers knew the community well enough to say, "It's a babysitting-sibling-family-thing, no need to handcuff anyone."

That's overly simplistic but either way, the times, they have sure changed. So perhaps we need to realize that human nature hasn't. Just as parents sometimes make poor choices when they're in need of a fast solution in busy times, so too is there a rush to criticize someone else's choice, even in that there-but-for-the-grace-of-the-universe-go-I moment in time.

For even if we haven't walked a mile in someone else's shoes, at some point we likely have taken a few steps along the very same path.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Stratford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Dom DeCicco May 31, 2012 at 09:20 am
Oh, there was a piece written about leaving thirteen year olds to watch younger children in the Patch, I guess this means DCF will be pushing a new law through the State Building in a few weeks. LOL
Guy Falotico May 31, 2012 at 06:13 pm
My kids are 10 and 6. We leave the 10 at home alone when we have to, but never with the 6. As the story said, definitely when they're 15 and 11 they can stay home alone together, and maybe a year or two before that. But not yet--and I sure as heck wouldn't leave a 13 to watch 3 siblings, including a baby.
Some who read this may disagree with our approach of leaving a 10 home alone, but to each his own. I think the decision should be based on a number of factors: type of kid, what the kid will be doing during the time alone, how long a time the kid will be home, time of day, etc.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ashley Riera June 17, 2013 at 03:02 pm
To clarify, for those who are wondering why we can't just take the two cats up with us, we alreadyRead More have four cats, and a dog. We could only take two of the four cats with us, plus the dog (who is 14yrs. old.) The limit for the rental is three pets... this was a hard decision for us all. We would have taken them all if we could.
Bunny The Dog
Alyson Cahill June 13, 2013 at 07:01 am
Edit: Bunny was stolen WITH the truck. Suspect is Caucasian male in his 50s. Truck is red Dodge RamRead More with dent in rear passenger side cab. Please help! Call 203-257-3001 or 203-645-1282 with any information. No questions asked.
bpiretti June 13, 2013 at 12:15 pm
Found!! https://www.facebook.com/BringBunnyHome
Shirley B. Backus June 13, 2013 at 11:05 pm
Another example of why to never leave your pet unattended in your vehicle!
A photo of Sam (Credit: Contributed Photo)
Amy Taylor June 13, 2013 at 12:25 am
Thank you so much! You have no idea how grateful we are! You are very special people!!
Kathie June 13, 2013 at 03:58 am
Now that Sam has been found, the reason he ran off was due to the sound of gunfire at RooseveltRead More Forest in the early afternoon as his master was getting ready to take him out of his car. All had been quiet, the park was open, so the loud bangs were a surprise - both to Sam and his "Dad". To the best of my knowledge, when the shooting range is used by the Stratford PD, the park is closed to the public. It was that way always and I believe still is. But now, with non-Stratford police personnel using the range, obviously the Park is NOT closed as was observed/heard yesterday at 2 separate time periods of the day. The range is used by at least one other police department. Of course, there could be unauthorized people using the range too. I just don't know. But what I do know that yesterday (Wed), there was shooting early afternoon, and then again around 6PM. I observed at around 5:00PM, a little boy running up the dirt road that leads to the shooting range. The park remained opened all day! The shooting was NOT being done by the Stratford Police. People do not always stick to the trails, and as we all know, children can be quite curious. Who is to say a child and/or adult gets near the berm or behind it and someone shoots over the berm? What goes up, has to come down. I also was told that neighbors say there is shooting going on quite frequently, even on Sundays. I doubt that this is from Stratford PD, because outdoor shooting usually occurs for a week or so, twice a year. Tighter controls must be done! Surely, the parking area can be checked for vehicles... but I observed yesterday people entering the parking area (adjacent to the driveway leading up to the range) on foot, on bicycles, and motorcycles. So people could be in the park even when no vehicles are observed in the lot. Safety is key here! Procedures need to be put in place and perhaps limitations on when other police department(s) can use the range. It is not fair to the surrounding residents to have to hear the bang bang bang on Saturdays and Sundays. It scares some of them, and I know that one person who lives nearby says her dog gets scared right inside their house! What will it take? A child or an adult wandering near the range, thinking it is OK because the Forest is open... and then, all of a sudden, there is shooting and one gets shot, especially a child? This may sound extreme, but children can move quick and suddenly. I think of that little boy running up toward the range. He could have very well traveled through the woods. I can picture bullets being shot over the berm, not on purpose, but it can happen. Or shots go to the left or to the right; and people could be in the same general area - out of sight of the shooters. Bottom Line: The "public" can not be in the park while the range is "live", or in other words, when there is shooting taking place. As how to ensure that the public is not in the park, is not for me to determine. But the Town has to step up to the plate and address this very important issue.
bpiretti June 13, 2013 at 11:17 am
So happy to hear that your dog has been found! :)
ShirleyJ June 11, 2013 at 09:00 pm
Great shot! We were looking for the rainbow!!!
samgranata June 12, 2013 at 08:12 am
Great shot! One of my favorite places to take pictures of weather
Jaimie Cura (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 02:03 pm
That's beautiful Carol! I'm surrounded by land so this is so great to see!
re26 June 14, 2013 at 04:19 am
Reagan's quote is from the 1988 GOP convention that 'facts are stupid things'...John Adams made theRead More original quote.
Steve Raguskus June 15, 2013 at 10:20 am
I hope people note how these comments go. Anonymous right-wingers try to change the discussion,Read More prove a point that no one is arguing, and then declare victory. Both "Goodie Bassett" and "Reagan Night" say Ms. Daponte is lying because Tony Smith won't be removed from office. I just re-read Beth's piece to see where she made this claim, but she never said anything of the sort. What she did say was "Both Tony and Linda serve until January 1, 2016." So, where's the "half-truth"? The point of the post is that the new land use District II, comprised of the 3rd & 4th council districts, has no representation on any of these boards. Tony Smith will be the District II Zoning Commissioner, even though he doesn't live in that district. The extreme right can't defend this, so they try to change the subject.
richard brown June 15, 2013 at 12:29 pm
Isn't it odd that the half truths are written by people that won't sigh their real name but theRead More Democrats sign theirs. Huh, guess they don't want to be held accountable for their inuendo's and false acusations.
Robert Chambers June 10, 2013 at 04:15 pm
If the worst thing against Mayor Harkins is the lack of allowance of golf carts on the streets ofRead More Lordship then he's doing pretty well.
Mike Reynolds June 10, 2013 at 10:25 pm
Robert Chambers...a voice of reason in Lordship.
Truckie June 11, 2013 at 09:54 am
What a wonderful town we live in that the only problem we have worthwhile to discuss is golf cartsRead More driving down the street! WHO CARES? I have kids riding their go carts and mini bikes around our neighborhood. They learn how to fix them and have some fun which doen't include stealing or damaging my property. Actually I enjoy helping them and occasionally lend them a tool or two. The parents make them be considerate by not allowing them to ride around early morning or late evenings. SO WHO CARES! I guess you will want to stop all the people at Oronoque condos from driving across the road up there too? Hey..on the road is on the road. Again, WHO CARES? Get informed and worry about a real problem facing us here in town!