.
Feedback

ACKER Goes to Court – Come Demonstrate!

Save the date - Acker goes to court on Wednesday, Dec. 12th 9:00am

Save The Date To Demonstrate. Weds. Dec. 12, 9:00am, Superior Court Litchfield District.  

Let us gather at the Court House to let the judicial system know that there are a lot of concerned citizens who are going to be watching the outcome of the prosecution of Fred Acker for 62 counts of FELONY animal cruelty.

Having been an animal control officer for over 25 years, it has been my experience that the police, prosecutors, and judges do not look at animal cruelty cases as very important. No one in Connecticut has ever gone to jail for commiting this crime. The average penalty has been a suspended sentence, probation, and community service.

A true community service would be to send these criminals to prison. The penalty, under the law is 5 years in prison and/or a $5,000.00 fine for each count. I feel this problem, because it is so lucrative, and is so easy to take advantage of the average persons feelings for unwanted and abandoned dogs and cats, needs to be addressed the same as child abuse and trafficking in human beings. Let the punishment fit the crime.

By demonstrating before this court house, a message will be sent to the prosecutor and the judge that the good people of Connecticut want our animal cruelty laws to be treated the same as child abuse laws. Nothing less.

Bring your friends, some coffee, and a large poster. See you on the Green at 9:00AM.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Stratford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Debbie December 11, 2012 at 01:09 am
Superior Court Litchfield District
15 West St. Litchfield,CT.
The Dog Blog December 12, 2012 at 01:14 am
Are the dogs in a cage dogs from spca or brought into state. Heartbreaking
jim laguardia December 12, 2012 at 04:25 am
Is that a stock photo or one from the actual spca?? As much as I hope the guy gets punished for what he did do, if that is a stock photo then that is a little overkill by the author
DS December 12, 2012 at 11:25 am
Give him the death penalty !!! Charge him with hate crimes ! Throw the book at him !! Worst crime ever in the state of CT !!
Kathleen Gemmell December 12, 2012 at 11:45 am
I must say that I've never seen such a HORRIFIC photo of animal abuse. Who, in their 'right mind' could allow for this? I ask myself, (and others) what can be done to FOREVER end seeing this? Why are abuse laws so lenient and why to we continue to foster this behavior by purchasing from the people involved? Dear God...
Paul Alexander December 12, 2012 at 01:55 pm
DS,
You have gone COMPLETELY off the deep end. "Worst crime ever in the state of CT !!" Huh??? Dr. Bill Petit might disagree. "Death Penalty" "Hate Crimes" ????? That's not just a LITTLE extreme, it's WAY extreme.
re26 December 12, 2012 at 02:23 pm
NOTE: the photo of the dogs in the cage is a stock photo. From Scientific American article of April, 19 2010.
jim laguardia December 12, 2012 at 02:36 pm
See that is the kind of tactic that gives animal lovers a bad name..... Under credit it has authors name like he took the picture and then it turns out to be a stock photo. Should be removed
Beth December 12, 2012 at 09:01 pm
Totally agree. The credibility of the words are undermined by the intentional use of a controversial, inaccurate photo.
Debbie December 12, 2012 at 09:13 pm
Maybe the photo was a good way to bring attention to the article and to draw attention to the problem at hand.
Mary Davis December 12, 2012 at 11:10 pm
Why don't we NOT try to influence the court and let them judge on the facts of the case and the law? Organizing a protest at the court is just wrong. Shouting "Crucify Him" didn't work 1,979 years ago and judging someone by a crowd that shouts the loudest doesn't work today either!
jim laguardia December 12, 2012 at 11:50 pm
I could be wrong but it seems the yelling "crucify him" did work??
brutus December 13, 2012 at 01:31 am
Paul, I think you may have missed that day of school when they taught sarcasm.
mia December 13, 2012 at 02:55 am
according to the criminal docket the charges are misdemeanor -not felony- charges.
felony would indicate "intent" to cause harm. also the photo is a "stock" photo. this case is sad enough without inflammatory misinformation being printed.
Leah E. December 13, 2012 at 03:36 am
Acker is one issue,
The fact that this 'stock' photo exists at all, is another.
Mary Davis December 14, 2012 at 07:22 pm
@Jim: FYI.. It didn't work.. if you know the story.. an innocent man was crucified and a guilty one was let go. So I stand by my original statement.. passing judgement by yelling the loudest doesn't work.
Debbie December 15, 2012 at 10:22 pm
Anyone interested in more info about Acker,click this link.. http://affirmativemaybejustified.blogspot.com/2009/07/racism-what-would-people-do-without-it.html
......................and this is a "wonderful person"?
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ashley Riera June 17, 2013 at 03:02 pm
To clarify, for those who are wondering why we can't just take the two cats up with us, we alreadyRead More have four cats, and a dog. We could only take two of the four cats with us, plus the dog (who is 14yrs. old.) The limit for the rental is three pets... this was a hard decision for us all. We would have taken them all if we could.
Bunny The Dog
Alyson Cahill June 13, 2013 at 07:01 am
Edit: Bunny was stolen WITH the truck. Suspect is Caucasian male in his 50s. Truck is red Dodge RamRead More with dent in rear passenger side cab. Please help! Call 203-257-3001 or 203-645-1282 with any information. No questions asked.
bpiretti June 13, 2013 at 12:15 pm
Found!! https://www.facebook.com/BringBunnyHome
Shirley B. Backus June 13, 2013 at 11:05 pm
Another example of why to never leave your pet unattended in your vehicle!
A photo of Sam (Credit: Contributed Photo)
Amy Taylor June 13, 2013 at 12:25 am
Thank you so much! You have no idea how grateful we are! You are very special people!!
Kathie June 13, 2013 at 03:58 am
Now that Sam has been found, the reason he ran off was due to the sound of gunfire at RooseveltRead More Forest in the early afternoon as his master was getting ready to take him out of his car. All had been quiet, the park was open, so the loud bangs were a surprise - both to Sam and his "Dad". To the best of my knowledge, when the shooting range is used by the Stratford PD, the park is closed to the public. It was that way always and I believe still is. But now, with non-Stratford police personnel using the range, obviously the Park is NOT closed as was observed/heard yesterday at 2 separate time periods of the day. The range is used by at least one other police department. Of course, there could be unauthorized people using the range too. I just don't know. But what I do know that yesterday (Wed), there was shooting early afternoon, and then again around 6PM. I observed at around 5:00PM, a little boy running up the dirt road that leads to the shooting range. The park remained opened all day! The shooting was NOT being done by the Stratford Police. People do not always stick to the trails, and as we all know, children can be quite curious. Who is to say a child and/or adult gets near the berm or behind it and someone shoots over the berm? What goes up, has to come down. I also was told that neighbors say there is shooting going on quite frequently, even on Sundays. I doubt that this is from Stratford PD, because outdoor shooting usually occurs for a week or so, twice a year. Tighter controls must be done! Surely, the parking area can be checked for vehicles... but I observed yesterday people entering the parking area (adjacent to the driveway leading up to the range) on foot, on bicycles, and motorcycles. So people could be in the park even when no vehicles are observed in the lot. Safety is key here! Procedures need to be put in place and perhaps limitations on when other police department(s) can use the range. It is not fair to the surrounding residents to have to hear the bang bang bang on Saturdays and Sundays. It scares some of them, and I know that one person who lives nearby says her dog gets scared right inside their house! What will it take? A child or an adult wandering near the range, thinking it is OK because the Forest is open... and then, all of a sudden, there is shooting and one gets shot, especially a child? This may sound extreme, but children can move quick and suddenly. I think of that little boy running up toward the range. He could have very well traveled through the woods. I can picture bullets being shot over the berm, not on purpose, but it can happen. Or shots go to the left or to the right; and people could be in the same general area - out of sight of the shooters. Bottom Line: The "public" can not be in the park while the range is "live", or in other words, when there is shooting taking place. As how to ensure that the public is not in the park, is not for me to determine. But the Town has to step up to the plate and address this very important issue.
bpiretti June 13, 2013 at 11:17 am
So happy to hear that your dog has been found! :)
ShirleyJ June 11, 2013 at 09:00 pm
Great shot! We were looking for the rainbow!!!
samgranata June 12, 2013 at 08:12 am
Great shot! One of my favorite places to take pictures of weather
Jaimie Cura (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 02:03 pm
That's beautiful Carol! I'm surrounded by land so this is so great to see!
re26 June 14, 2013 at 04:19 am
Reagan's quote is from the 1988 GOP convention that 'facts are stupid things'...John Adams made theRead More original quote.
Steve Raguskus June 15, 2013 at 10:20 am
I hope people note how these comments go. Anonymous right-wingers try to change the discussion,Read More prove a point that no one is arguing, and then declare victory. Both "Goodie Bassett" and "Reagan Night" say Ms. Daponte is lying because Tony Smith won't be removed from office. I just re-read Beth's piece to see where she made this claim, but she never said anything of the sort. What she did say was "Both Tony and Linda serve until January 1, 2016." So, where's the "half-truth"? The point of the post is that the new land use District II, comprised of the 3rd & 4th council districts, has no representation on any of these boards. Tony Smith will be the District II Zoning Commissioner, even though he doesn't live in that district. The extreme right can't defend this, so they try to change the subject.
richard brown June 15, 2013 at 12:29 pm
Isn't it odd that the half truths are written by people that won't sigh their real name but theRead More Democrats sign theirs. Huh, guess they don't want to be held accountable for their inuendo's and false acusations.
Robert Chambers June 10, 2013 at 04:15 pm
If the worst thing against Mayor Harkins is the lack of allowance of golf carts on the streets ofRead More Lordship then he's doing pretty well.
Mike Reynolds June 10, 2013 at 10:25 pm
Robert Chambers...a voice of reason in Lordship.
Truckie June 11, 2013 at 09:54 am
What a wonderful town we live in that the only problem we have worthwhile to discuss is golf cartsRead More driving down the street! WHO CARES? I have kids riding their go carts and mini bikes around our neighborhood. They learn how to fix them and have some fun which doen't include stealing or damaging my property. Actually I enjoy helping them and occasionally lend them a tool or two. The parents make them be considerate by not allowing them to ride around early morning or late evenings. SO WHO CARES! I guess you will want to stop all the people at Oronoque condos from driving across the road up there too? Hey..on the road is on the road. Again, WHO CARES? Get informed and worry about a real problem facing us here in town!